illinois: have again townships

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.62
, university
Weight: 0.59
, north carolina
Weight: 0.59
, michigan
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.64
, indiana
Weight: 0.64
, chicago
Weight: 0.63
, south carolina
Weight: 0.36
, florida
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have again townships 1.00
have townships 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(michigan, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(illinois, have again townships)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(illinois, have again townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(michigan, have townships)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have again townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(michigan, have townships)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have again townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have townships)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have again townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have townships)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(michigan, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(illinois, have again townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(illinois, have again townships)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(illinois, have again townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(indiana, have townships)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(illinois, have again townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(ohio, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ohio, have townships)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(illinois, have again townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(illinois, have again townships)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(illinois, have again townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(illinois, have townships)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(illinois, have again townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(illinois, have townships)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(illinois, have again townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(illinois, have townships)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(illinois, have again townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have townships)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(illinois, have again townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(illinois, have again townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have again townships)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(illinois, have again townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(illinois, have again townships)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have again townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(michigan, have townships)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have again townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(indiana, have townships)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have again townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, have townships)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(illinois, have again townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(michigan, have townships)