illinois: have earthquakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.62
, university
Weight: 0.59
, north carolina
Weight: 0.59
, michigan
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.64
, indiana
Weight: 0.64
, chicago
Weight: 0.63
, south carolina
Weight: 0.36
, florida
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have earthquakes 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(illinois, have earthquakes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(illinois, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(michigan, have earthquakes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(michigan, have earthquakes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have earthquakes)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have earthquakes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(illinois, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(illinois, have earthquakes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(illinois, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(ohio, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ohio, have earthquakes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(illinois, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(indiana, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(indiana, have earthquakes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(illinois, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(illinois, have earthquakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(illinois, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(illinois, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have earthquakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(illinois, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(illinois, have earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(michigan, have earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(ohio, have earthquakes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(indiana, have earthquakes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(illinois, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(michigan, have earthquakes)