illinois: is blue state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.62
, university
Weight: 0.59
, north carolina
Weight: 0.59
, michigan
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.64
, indiana
Weight: 0.64
, chicago
Weight: 0.63
, south carolina
Weight: 0.36
, florida
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is blue state 1.00
has color blue 0.88
has state state 0.80
has color yellow 0.79
be called state 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(illinois, is blue state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(illinois, is blue state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(university, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(illinois, is blue state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(michigan, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(illinois, is blue state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(michigan, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(michigan, is blue state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(university, be called state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(michigan, has color blue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has color blue)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has state state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(university, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(chicago, has color blue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chicago, has color yellow)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(florida, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(illinois, is blue state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(illinois, is blue state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(university, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(illinois, is blue state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(michigan, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(illinois, is blue state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(florida, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(chicago, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chicago, has color blue)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chicago, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(chicago, has color yellow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(illinois, is blue state)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(illinois, has state state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(illinois, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(illinois, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(illinois, has color blue)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(illinois, has color yellow)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(illinois, has color blue)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(illinois, has color yellow)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(illinois, has color blue)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(illinois, has color yellow)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(illinois, has color blue)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(illinois, has color yellow)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(illinois, has state state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(illinois, is blue state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(michigan, is blue state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(michigan, has color blue)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(university, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chicago, has color blue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chicago, has color yellow)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(university, be called state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(michigan, is blue state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(michigan, has color blue)