imac: be slow on internet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer
Weight: 0.64
, desktop
Weight: 0.58
, system
Weight: 0.56
, laptop
Weight: 0.54
Siblings tablet computer
Weight: 0.35
, macintosh
Weight: 0.35
, computer mouse
Weight: 0.34
, computer programmer
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be slow on internet 1.00
is slow 0.84
run slow 0.80
losing internet connection 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(computer, is slow)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(imac, be slow on internet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(desktop, is slow)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(imac, be slow on internet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(computer, run slow)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(imac, be slow on internet)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(desktop, run slow)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(imac, be slow on internet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(desktop, run slow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(computer, run slow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(desktop, is slow)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(computer, is slow)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(desktop, run slow)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(desktop, is slow)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(computer, run slow)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(computer, is slow)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(computer, is slow)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(imac, be slow on internet)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(desktop, is slow)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(imac, be slow on internet)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(computer, run slow)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(imac, be slow on internet)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(desktop, run slow)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(imac, be slow on internet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(imac, be slow on internet)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(imac, run slow)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(imac, run slow)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(imac, run slow)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(imac, run slow)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(imac, is slow)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(imac, is slow)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(imac, is slow)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(imac, is slow)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(imac, losing internet connection)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(imac, losing internet connection)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(imac, losing internet connection)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(imac, losing internet connection)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(imac, be slow on internet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(imac, be slow on internet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(desktop, run slow)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(desktop, is slow)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(computer, run slow)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(computer, is slow)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(desktop, run slow)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(desktop, is slow)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(computer, run slow)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(imac, be slow on internet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(computer, is slow)