imac: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer
Weight: 0.64
, desktop
Weight: 0.58
, system
Weight: 0.56
, laptop
Weight: 0.54
Siblings tablet computer
Weight: 0.35
, macintosh
Weight: 0.35
, computer mouse
Weight: 0.34
, computer programmer
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be cheaper than macbooks 0.81
is overpriced 0.79
is cheap 0.79
be cheaper than pro 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(computer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(imac, is expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(laptop, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(imac, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(desktop, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(imac, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(desktop, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(laptop, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(computer, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(desktop, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(laptop, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(computer, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(macintosh, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(computer mouse, is overpriced)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(computer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(imac, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(laptop, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(imac, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(desktop, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(imac, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(macintosh, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(macintosh, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(computer mouse, is overpriced)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(computer mouse, is overpriced)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(imac, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(imac, be cheaper than macbooks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(imac, be cheaper than macbooks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(imac, is overpriced)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(imac, is overpriced)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(imac, be cheaper than macbooks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(imac, be cheaper than pro)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(imac, is cheap)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(imac, is cheap)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(imac, is overpriced)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(imac, be cheaper than pro)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(imac, be cheaper than pro)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(imac, is cheap)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(imac, be cheaper than pro)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(imac, be cheaper than macbooks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(imac, is overpriced)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(imac, is cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(imac, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(imac, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(desktop, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(laptop, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(computer, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(macintosh, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer mouse, is overpriced)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(desktop, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(laptop, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(imac, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(computer, is expensive)