immunity: be considered as specific

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.56
, condition
Weight: 0.56
, immune response
Weight: 0.55
Siblings common law
Weight: 0.62
, prohibition
Weight: 0.32
, habeas corpus
Weight: 0.31
, freedom
Weight: 0.31
, subpoena
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered as specific 1.00
be considered as non specific 0.95
be called specific 0.92
is specific 0.92
be specific to one type 0.90
be called non specific 0.90
is non specific 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(immunity, be considered as specific)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(immunity, be considered as non specific)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(immunity, be considered as non specific)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(immunity, is non specific)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(immunity, be specific to one type)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(immunity, is specific)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(immunity, be called non specific)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(immunity, be called specific)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(immunity, be called specific)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(immunity, be called specific)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(immunity, be called non specific)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(immunity, be called non specific)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(immunity, is non specific)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(immunity, be considered as non specific)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(immunity, be called non specific)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(immunity, be called specific)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(immunity, is non specific)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(immunity, be specific to one type)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(immunity, is specific)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(immunity, be considered as non specific)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(immunity, is specific)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(immunity, is non specific)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(immunity, be specific to one type)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(immunity, is specific)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(immunity, be specific to one type)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(immunity, be considered as specific)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(immunity, be considered as specific)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(immunity, be considered as specific)