imperial: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, part
Weight: 0.49
, stout
Weight: 0.47
Siblings royal
Weight: 0.32
, venture capitalist
Weight: 0.32
, banana republic
Weight: 0.31
, civilization
Weight: 0.31
, fiat
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
be bad in 2v2 0.87
has quality system 0.82
has quality worth 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(civilization, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(venture capitalist, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fiat, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fiat, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(civilization, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(civilization, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fiat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fiat, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(venture capitalist, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(venture capitalist, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fiat, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(imperial, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(imperial, be bad in 2v2)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(imperial, be bad in 2v2)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(imperial, be bad in 2v2)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(imperial, be bad in 2v2)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(imperial, has quality system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(imperial, has quality worth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(imperial, has quality system)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(imperial, has quality system)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(imperial, has quality worth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(imperial, has quality worth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality system)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(imperial, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(civilization, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fiat, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(venture capitalist, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fiat, has quality worth)