implantation: fail in ivf

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgical procedure
Weight: 0.63
, treatment
Weight: 0.52
, construction
Weight: 0.49
, method
Weight: 0.49
Siblings implant
Weight: 0.37
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.36
, ablation
Weight: 0.35
, hysterectomy
Weight: 0.35
, mastectomy
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail in ivf 1.00
fail after ivf 0.97
fail 0.89
fail part i 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(implant, fail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(ablation, fail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(implant, fail part i)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(implant, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(implant, fail)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(ablation, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(ablation, fail)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(implant, fail part i) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(implant, fail part i)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(implantation, fail in ivf)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(implantation, fail after ivf)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(implantation, fail)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(implantation, fail)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(implantation, fail after ivf)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(implantation, fail after ivf)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(implantation, fail after ivf)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(implantation, fail)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(implantation, fail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(implantation, fail in ivf)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(implantation, fail in ivf)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(implant, fail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ablation, fail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(implantation, fail in ivf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(implant, fail part i)