implantation: keep failing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgical procedure
Weight: 0.63
, treatment
Weight: 0.52
, construction
Weight: 0.49
, method
Weight: 0.49
Siblings implant
Weight: 0.37
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.36
, ablation
Weight: 0.35
, hysterectomy
Weight: 0.35
, mastectomy
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
keep failing 1.00
fail 0.79
fail after ivf 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(implantation, keep failing)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(implant, fail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(implantation, keep failing)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(ablation, fail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(implantation, keep failing)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(implant, fail)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(implant, fail)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(implantation, keep failing)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(ablation, fail)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(ablation, fail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(implantation, keep failing)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(implantation, keep failing)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(implantation, keep failing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(implantation, fail)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(implantation, keep failing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(implantation, fail)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(implantation, keep failing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(implantation, fail)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(implantation, keep failing)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(implantation, fail)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(implantation, keep failing)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(implantation, fail after ivf)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(implantation, keep failing)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(implantation, fail after ivf)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(implantation, keep failing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(implantation, fail after ivf)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(implantation, keep failing)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(implantation, fail after ivf)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(implantation, keep failing)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(implantation, keep failing)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(implantation, keep failing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(implantation, keep failing)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(implantation, keep failing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(implantation, keep failing)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(implant, fail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(implantation, keep failing)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ablation, fail)