imprisonment: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents punishment
Weight: 0.76
, sentence
Weight: 0.71
, penalty
Weight: 0.71
, sanction
Weight: 0.65
, suffering
Weight: 0.54
Siblings capital punishment
Weight: 0.38
, jail
Weight: 0.37
, suspension
Weight: 0.35
, death
Weight: 0.34
, prosecution
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
be with good 0.85
has quality wrong 0.85
is great 0.81
is better 0.78
is good thing 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(imprisonment, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(punishment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(imprisonment, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(suffering, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(imprisonment, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(punishment, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(imprisonment, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(punishment, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(imprisonment, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(suffering, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(punishment, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(punishment, is good thing)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sanction, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(punishment, has quality wrong)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(punishment, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(punishment, has quality wrong)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(punishment, is good thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(suspension, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(jail, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(capital punishment, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(capital punishment, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(imprisonment, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(punishment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(imprisonment, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(suffering, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(imprisonment, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(punishment, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(imprisonment, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(punishment, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(imprisonment, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(capital punishment, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(capital punishment, is good thing)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(suspension, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(suspension, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(capital punishment, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(capital punishment, has quality wrong)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(jail, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(jail, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(imprisonment, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(imprisonment, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(suffering, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(punishment, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(punishment, has quality wrong)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(punishment, is good thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(suspension, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(jail, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(capital punishment, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(capital punishment, is good thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(suffering, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(punishment, is good thing)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(punishment, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(punishment, has quality wrong)