in: be diagram

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents show
Weight: 0.59
, site
Weight: 0.59
, city
Weight: 0.59
, part
Weight: 0.59
, form
Weight: 0.59
Siblings back
Weight: 0.32
, first
Weight: 0.32
, here
Weight: 0.32
, construction site
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be diagram 1.00
be first diagram 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(in, be diagram)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(in, be diagram)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(in, be diagram)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(in, be first diagram)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(in, be diagram)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(in, be first diagram)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(in, be diagram)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(in, be first diagram)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(in, be diagram)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(in, be first diagram)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(in, be diagram)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(in, be diagram)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(in, be diagram)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(in, be diagram)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(in, be diagram)