inclusion: be in tech important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.56
, characteristic
Weight: 0.55
, principle
Weight: 0.55
Siblings introduction
Weight: 0.33
, fairness
Weight: 0.31
, integration
Weight: 0.31
, incorporation
Weight: 0.31
, switch
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in tech 1.00
be in tech important 1.00
be in tech 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(inclusion, be in tech important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(inclusion, be in tech important)

Similarity expansion

0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(inclusion, be in tech important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(inclusion, be important in tech)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(inclusion, be in tech important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(inclusion, be in tech)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(inclusion, be in tech important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(inclusion, be in tech)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(inclusion, be in tech important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(inclusion, be important in tech)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(inclusion, be in tech important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(inclusion, be in tech)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(inclusion, be in tech important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(inclusion, be important in tech)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(inclusion, be in tech important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be in tech)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(inclusion, be in tech important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be important in tech)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(inclusion, be in tech important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(inclusion, be in tech important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be in tech important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(inclusion, be in tech important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(inclusion, be in tech important)