inclusion: be used in relative process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.56
, characteristic
Weight: 0.55
, principle
Weight: 0.55
Siblings introduction
Weight: 0.33
, fairness
Weight: 0.31
, integration
Weight: 0.31
, incorporation
Weight: 0.31
, switch
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in relative process 1.00
be used in relative dating process 0.91
be used in process 0.88
be used in dating process 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inclusion, be used in relative process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(inclusion, be used in relative process)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(inclusion, be used in relative process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(inclusion, be used in process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inclusion, be used in relative process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inclusion, be used in process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(inclusion, be used in relative process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be used in relative dating process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(inclusion, be used in relative process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(inclusion, be used in process)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(inclusion, be used in relative process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be used in dating process)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(inclusion, be used in relative process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(inclusion, be used in relative dating process)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(inclusion, be used in relative process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(inclusion, be used in dating process)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(inclusion, be used in relative process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(inclusion, be used in relative dating process)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(inclusion, be used in relative process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be used in process)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inclusion, be used in relative process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(inclusion, be used in relative dating process)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(inclusion, be used in relative process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(inclusion, be used in dating process)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inclusion, be used in relative process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(inclusion, be used in dating process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(inclusion, be used in relative process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(inclusion, be used in relative process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be used in relative process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inclusion, be used in relative process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(inclusion, be used in relative process)