inclusion: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	program Weight: 0.58 , topic Weight: 0.57 , feature Weight: 0.56 , characteristic Weight: 0.55 , principle Weight: 0.55
Siblings	introduction Weight: 0.33 , fairness Weight: 0.31 , integration Weight: 0.31 , incorporation Weight: 0.31 , switch Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
is quality	0.91
be good for business	0.80
is good thing	0.78
has quality questions	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(inclusion, has quality good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(program, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(inclusion, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(program, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(inclusion, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(program, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(program, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(program, has quality bad)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(program, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(introduction, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(integration, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(incorporation, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(integration, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(introduction, has quality questions)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(inclusion, has quality good)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(program, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(inclusion, has quality good)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(program, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(inclusion, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(integration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(integration, has quality good)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(incorporation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(incorporation, has quality good)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(integration, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(integration, has quality bad)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(introduction, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(introduction, has quality bad)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(integration, is good thing)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(introduction, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(introduction, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(inclusion, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(inclusion, has quality bad)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(inclusion, has quality bad)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(inclusion, has quality bad)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality bad)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(inclusion, be good for business)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(inclusion, be good for business)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(inclusion, be good for business)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be good for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(inclusion, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(program, is quality)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(integration, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(integration, is good thing)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(integration, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(introduction, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(introduction, has quality questions)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(incorporation, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(inclusion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(program, is quality)