inclusion: is ethical

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.56
, characteristic
Weight: 0.55
, principle
Weight: 0.55
Siblings introduction
Weight: 0.33
, fairness
Weight: 0.31
, integration
Weight: 0.31
, incorporation
Weight: 0.31
, switch
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is ethical 1.00
is ethical issue 0.94
be in business ethical concerns 0.88
be in business important ethical concerns 0.88
be in business ethical concerns give 0.86
be in business important ethical concerns give 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(fairness, be in business ethical concerns)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fairness, be in business ethical concerns give)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fairness, be in business important ethical concerns give)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(fairness, be in business important ethical concerns)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(inclusion, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(fairness, be in business ethical concerns)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(fairness, be in business ethical concerns)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(inclusion, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(fairness, be in business important ethical concerns)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fairness, be in business important ethical concerns)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(inclusion, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(fairness, be in business ethical concerns give)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fairness, be in business ethical concerns give)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(inclusion, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(fairness, be in business important ethical concerns give)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fairness, be in business important ethical concerns give)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(inclusion, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(inclusion, is ethical)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(inclusion, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inclusion, is ethical issue)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(inclusion, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(inclusion, is ethical issue)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(inclusion, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inclusion, is ethical issue)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(inclusion, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, is ethical issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(inclusion, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(inclusion, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, is ethical)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(inclusion, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(inclusion, is ethical)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(fairness, be in business ethical concerns)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fairness, be in business ethical concerns give)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fairness, be in business important ethical concerns give)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fairness, be in business important ethical concerns)