inclusion: is human

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.56
, characteristic
Weight: 0.55
, principle
Weight: 0.55
Siblings introduction
Weight: 0.33
, fairness
Weight: 0.31
, integration
Weight: 0.31
, incorporation
Weight: 0.31
, switch
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is human 1.00
is human rights issue 0.79
influence human culture 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(feature, influence human culture)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inclusion, is human)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(inclusion, is human)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(feature, influence human culture)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, is human)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(feature, influence human culture)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(feature, influence human culture)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(inclusion, is human)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(inclusion, is human)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(inclusion, is human)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(inclusion, is human)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(inclusion, is human)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, is human rights issue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(inclusion, is human)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(inclusion, is human rights issue)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(inclusion, is human)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(inclusion, is human rights issue)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(inclusion, is human)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(inclusion, is human rights issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(inclusion, is human)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inclusion, is human)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, is human)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(inclusion, is human)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inclusion, is human)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, is human)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(feature, influence human culture)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(inclusion, is human)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(feature, influence human culture)