income tax: be considered constitutional

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.80
, levy
Weight: 0.75
, tax
Weight: 0.75
, cost
Weight: 0.69
Siblings interest
Weight: 0.64
, unearned income
Weight: 0.39
, operating expense
Weight: 0.36
, surcharge
Weight: 0.36
, unemployment
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered constitutional 1.00
is unconstitutional 0.78
is legal 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be considered constitutional)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(interest, is legal)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be considered constitutional)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(surcharge, is legal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(income tax, be considered constitutional)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(surcharge, is legal)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(surcharge, is legal)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(income tax, be considered constitutional)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(interest, is legal)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(interest, is legal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(income tax, be considered constitutional)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(income tax, be considered constitutional)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(income tax, be considered constitutional)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is unconstitutional)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(income tax, be considered constitutional)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(income tax, is unconstitutional)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(income tax, be considered constitutional)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(income tax, is unconstitutional)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(income tax, be considered constitutional)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(income tax, is legal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(income tax, be considered constitutional)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(income tax, is unconstitutional)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(income tax, be considered constitutional)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is legal)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(income tax, be considered constitutional)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(income tax, is legal)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(income tax, be considered constitutional)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(income tax, is legal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(income tax, be considered constitutional)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(income tax, be considered constitutional)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be considered constitutional)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(income tax, be considered constitutional)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(income tax, be considered constitutional)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be considered constitutional)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(surcharge, is legal)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be considered constitutional)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(interest, is legal)