income tax: be high in quebec

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.80
, levy
Weight: 0.75
, tax
Weight: 0.75
, cost
Weight: 0.69
Siblings interest
Weight: 0.64
, unearned income
Weight: 0.39
, operating expense
Weight: 0.36
, surcharge
Weight: 0.36
, unemployment
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in quebec 1.00
be high in canada 0.85
be high in uk 0.80
be high in australia 0.79
be high in india 0.79
be high in ireland 0.78
be high in california 0.77
is high 0.76
be low in singapore 0.76
work in ontario 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(tax, be high in california)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in quebec)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(tax, be high in california)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tax, be high in california)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is high)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(tax, be high in california)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in quebec)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(unemployment, is high)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(unemployment, is high)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in quebec)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in canada)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in canada)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be low in singapore)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(income tax, be low in singapore)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in california)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(income tax, is high)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in canada)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in uk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(income tax, be low in singapore)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in india)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in australia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in india)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in uk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in ireland)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in uk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in uk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(income tax, is high)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in canada)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(income tax, be low in singapore)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is high)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in india)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(income tax, is high)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in australia)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in california)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in ireland)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in india)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in ireland)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in ireland)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in australia)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in california)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in australia)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in california)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in quebec)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tax, be high in california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(unemployment, is high)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(income tax, be high in quebec)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tax, be high in california)