income tax: has quality asset

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.80
, levy
Weight: 0.75
, tax
Weight: 0.75
, cost
Weight: 0.69
Siblings interest
Weight: 0.64
, unearned income
Weight: 0.39
, operating expense
Weight: 0.36
, surcharge
Weight: 0.36
, unemployment
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality asset 1.00
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(income, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality asset)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(income, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality asset)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(income, has quality asset)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(income, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(income, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(income, has quality asset)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(unearned income, has quality asset)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(operating expense, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(surcharge, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(income, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality asset)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(income, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality asset)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(unearned income, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(unearned income, has quality asset)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(operating expense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(operating expense, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(surcharge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(surcharge, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(income tax, has quality asset)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(income tax, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality asset)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality asset)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(income, has quality asset)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(income, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(unearned income, has quality asset)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(operating expense, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(surcharge, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(income, has quality asset)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(income, has quality good)