income tax: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	income Weight: 0.80 , levy Weight: 0.75 , tax Weight: 0.75 , cost Weight: 0.69
Siblings	interest Weight: 0.64 , unearned income Weight: 0.39 , operating expense Weight: 0.36 , surcharge Weight: 0.36 , unemployment Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality good	0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(income, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(income tax, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(income, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(income, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(surcharge, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(operating expense, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(surcharge, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(income, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(interest, has quality bad)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(operating expense, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(operating expense, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(surcharge, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(surcharge, has quality good)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(unemployment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(unemployment, has quality bad)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(surcharge, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(surcharge, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(income tax, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(income tax, has quality good)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(income tax, has quality good)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(income tax, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(income, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(interest, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(unemployment, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(operating expense, has quality good)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(surcharge, has quality good)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(surcharge, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(income, has quality good)