income tax: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.80
, levy
Weight: 0.75
, tax
Weight: 0.75
, cost
Weight: 0.69
Siblings interest
Weight: 0.64
, unearned income
Weight: 0.39
, operating expense
Weight: 0.36
, surcharge
Weight: 0.36
, unemployment
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality asset 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(income, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(income, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(income, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(income, has quality asset)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(income, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(income, has quality asset)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(surcharge, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(operating expense, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(surcharge, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(unearned income, has quality asset)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(income, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(income, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(operating expense, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(operating expense, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(surcharge, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(surcharge, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(interest, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(unemployment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(unemployment, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(surcharge, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(surcharge, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(unearned income, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(unearned income, has quality asset)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(income tax, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(income tax, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality asset)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality asset)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality asset)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(income tax, has quality asset)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(income, has quality asset)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(income, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(interest, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(operating expense, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(unearned income, has quality asset)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(surcharge, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(unemployment, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(surcharge, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(income, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(income, has quality asset)