income tax: is direct tax

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.80
, levy
Weight: 0.75
, tax
Weight: 0.75
, cost
Weight: 0.69
Siblings interest
Weight: 0.64
, unearned income
Weight: 0.39
, operating expense
Weight: 0.36
, surcharge
Weight: 0.36
, unemployment
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is direct tax 1.00
is tax 0.91
be much higher than investment tax 0.85
is progressive tax 0.84
be much higher than sales tax 0.84
rebate 0.77
be in universal income 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(income, is tax)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(income tax, is direct tax)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(income, is tax)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(income, is tax)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(income, is tax)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(income tax, is direct tax)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(income tax, is direct tax)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(income tax, is tax)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is tax)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(income tax, is tax)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is progressive tax)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(income tax, is tax)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(income tax, is progressive tax)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(income tax, is progressive tax)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(income tax, is progressive tax)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is direct tax)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(income tax, is direct tax)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(income, is tax)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(income tax, is direct tax)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(income, is tax)