income: be determined for 2008 tax rebates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tax
Weight: 0.64
, determinant
Weight: 0.61
, allowance
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.61
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.80
, operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, unemployment
Weight: 0.66
, poverty
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be determined for 2008 tax rebates 1.00
is tax 0.89
tax 0.89
be exempt from tax 0.83
is tax site 0.82
be called income 0.78
is refund 0.77
be taxed at lower rate 0.76
be taxed 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is tax)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(income tax, is tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(income tax, is tax)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(income, tax)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(income, tax)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(income, is tax)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(income, is tax)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(income, tax)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(income, is tax)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(income, be exempt from tax)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(income, be exempt from tax)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(income, is tax site)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(income, is tax site)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(income, be exempt from tax)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(income, is tax site)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(income, be taxed at lower rate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(income, be taxed at lower rate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(income, be taxed at lower rate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(income, be taxed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income, be taxed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(income, be taxed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(income, is tax)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(income, tax)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(income, be exempt from tax)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(income, be taxed at lower rate)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(income, is tax site)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(income, be taxed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(income tax, is tax)