income: be feasible in modern open economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tax
Weight: 0.64
, determinant
Weight: 0.61
, allowance
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.61
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.80
, operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, unemployment
Weight: 0.66
, poverty
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be feasible in modern open economy 1.00
major problem in economy 0.77
be bad for economy 0.77
is even necessary 0.77
have open market disadvantages of 0.76
have open market disadvantages 0.76
is desirable 0.75
be necessary at all 0.75
is necessary 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(tax, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(income, be feasible in modern open economy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(tax, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(tax, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, major problem in economy)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(tax, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(income, be feasible in modern open economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(income tax, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(income tax, is necessary)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be bad for economy)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(unemployment, major problem in economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(income, be feasible in modern open economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income, be feasible in modern open economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(income, be feasible in modern open economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(tax, is necessary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(income tax, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(unemployment, be bad for economy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(unemployment, major problem in economy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(income, be feasible in modern open economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(tax, is necessary)