income: be supposed work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tax
Weight: 0.64
, determinant
Weight: 0.61
, allowance
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.61
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.80
, operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, unemployment
Weight: 0.66
, poverty
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be supposed work 1.00
work with ltc 0.78
work on money 0.76
work with money 0.76
work for money 0.76
work on money made 0.76
work with money made 0.76
work for money made 0.76
is needed 0.75
be done 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(tax, is needed)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(income, be supposed work)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(business activity, is needed)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(income, be supposed work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(income, be supposed work)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(business activity, is needed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(income, be supposed work)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(tax, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(income, be supposed work)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(business activity, is needed)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(income, be supposed work)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tax, is needed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(tax, is needed)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(income, be supposed work)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(income, be supposed work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(business activity, is needed)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(income, be supposed work)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(income, be supposed work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(income, be supposed work)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(income, be supposed work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(income, be supposed work)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(income, be supposed work)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(income, be supposed work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(income, be supposed work)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(income, be supposed work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(income, be supposed work)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(business activity, is needed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(income, be supposed work)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(tax, is needed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(income, be supposed work)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(business activity, is needed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(income, be supposed work)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(tax, is needed)