increase: be in accounts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amount
Weight: 0.66
, benefit
Weight: 0.64
, hike
Weight: 0.59
, measure
Weight: 0.59
Siblings decrease
Weight: 0.36
, rate
Weight: 0.33
, gain
Weight: 0.33
, proportion
Weight: 0.32
, savings
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in accounts 1.00
account work 0.86
be in accounts payable 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in accounts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(savings, account work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(increase, be in accounts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(savings, account work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(savings, account work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(increase, be in accounts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(increase, be in accounts)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(increase, be in accounts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(increase, be in accounts payable)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(increase, be in accounts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in accounts payable)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(increase, be in accounts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(increase, be in accounts payable)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(increase, be in accounts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(increase, be in accounts payable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(increase, be in accounts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(increase, be in accounts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in accounts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(increase, be in accounts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(increase, be in accounts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in accounts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(savings, account work)