increase: be in human population responsible for decline

Property	Similarity
be in human population responsible for decline	1.00
be in human population responsible for decline in population	0.98
be in population responsible for decline	0.98
be in human population responsible for decline in animal population	0.97
be in population responsible for decline in population	0.96
be in population responsible for decline in animal population	0.96
be in human population responsible	0.94
be in population responsible	0.92
be in human population	0.89
is population growth	0.84

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(increase, be in human population)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(increase, be in human population responsible)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in population responsible for decline)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in population responsible for decline in animal population)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in population)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(increase, be in human population)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in population responsible for decline in population)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in population responsible)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(increase, be in human population)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(increase, be in population responsible)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in human population)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(increase, be in human population responsible)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(increase, be in population responsible for decline)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(increase, be in population responsible)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in population)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in population)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(increase, be in population responsible for decline)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in population)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(increase, be in population responsible)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(increase, be in population responsible for decline)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(increase, be in population responsible for decline in animal population)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(increase, be in population responsible for decline in population)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(increase, be in population responsible for decline in population)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(increase, be in population responsible for decline in animal population)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(increase, be in population responsible for decline in population)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(increase, be in population responsible for decline in animal population)

Parents	amount Weight: 0.66 , benefit Weight: 0.64 , hike Weight: 0.59 , measure Weight: 0.59
Siblings	decrease Weight: 0.36 , rate Weight: 0.33 , gain Weight: 0.33 , proportion Weight: 0.32 , savings Weight: 0.32

increase: be in human population responsible for decline

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings