increase: be in human population responsible for decline in animal population

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amount
Weight: 0.66
, benefit
Weight: 0.64
, hike
Weight: 0.59
, measure
Weight: 0.59
Siblings decrease
Weight: 0.36
, rate
Weight: 0.33
, gain
Weight: 0.33
, proportion
Weight: 0.32
, savings
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in human population responsible for decline in animal population 1.00
be in population responsible for decline in animal population 0.99
be in human population responsible for decline in population 0.98
be in human population responsible for decline 0.97
be in population responsible for decline in population 0.96
be in population responsible for decline 0.95
be in human population responsible 0.94
be in human population 0.94
be in population responsible 0.91
be in population 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(increase, be in human population)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(increase, be in human population responsible)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(increase, be in human population)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(increase, be in population)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(increase, be in human population)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(increase, be in population)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in population responsible for decline in animal population)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(increase, be in population responsible)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in population)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(increase, be in population)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(increase, be in human population responsible)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in population)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in population responsible for decline)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in population)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(increase, be in population responsible for decline)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in population)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in population responsible for decline in population)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(increase, be in population responsible)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(increase, be in population responsible for decline in animal population)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(increase, be in population responsible for decline)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(increase, be in population responsible for decline)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(increase, be in population responsible)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(increase, be in population responsible for decline in population)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in human population)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(increase, be in population responsible for decline in population)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(increase, be in population responsible for decline in animal population)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(increase, be in population responsible for decline in population)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in population responsible)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(increase, be in population responsible for decline in animal population)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in population)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population)