increase: be in price increase profit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amount
Weight: 0.66
, benefit
Weight: 0.64
, hike
Weight: 0.59
, measure
Weight: 0.59
Siblings decrease
Weight: 0.36
, rate
Weight: 0.33
, gain
Weight: 0.33
, proportion
Weight: 0.32
, savings
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in price increase profit 1.00
be in share prices 0.86
be in prices 0.82
be in income 0.77
be in inventory decrease cash flow 0.76
be in material costs impact total variable costs 0.76
have low interest rates 0.75
have rise 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(decrease, be in prices)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(savings, have low interest rates)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(decrease, be in material costs impact total variable costs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(rate, have rise)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(decrease, be in prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(decrease, be in prices)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(rate, have rise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(rate, have rise)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(decrease, be in material costs impact total variable costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(decrease, be in material costs impact total variable costs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(savings, have low interest rates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(savings, have low interest rates)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(increase, be in price increase profit)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(increase, be in share prices)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(increase, be in share prices)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(increase, be in share prices)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(increase, be in income)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(increase, be in income)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(increase, be in income)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in share prices)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(increase, be in inventory decrease cash flow)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(increase, be in inventory decrease cash flow)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(increase, be in inventory decrease cash flow)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in inventory decrease cash flow)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in income)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in price increase profit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(increase, be in price increase profit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(rate, have rise)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(decrease, be in prices)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(savings, have low interest rates)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in price increase profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(decrease, be in material costs impact total variable costs)