increase: be in property taxes paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amount
Weight: 0.66
, benefit
Weight: 0.64
, hike
Weight: 0.59
, measure
Weight: 0.59
Siblings decrease
Weight: 0.36
, rate
Weight: 0.33
, gain
Weight: 0.33
, proportion
Weight: 0.32
, savings
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in property taxes paid 1.00
be in property taxes 0.97
is taxed 0.81
get taxed 0.80
be in income 0.78
be subtracted from income 0.75
be from bitcoin trading taxed 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from income)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(gain, be from bitcoin trading taxed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(savings, get taxed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(savings, is taxed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(savings, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(savings, is taxed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(savings, get taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(savings, get taxed)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from income) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(gain, be subtracted from income)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(gain, be from bitcoin trading taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(gain, be from bitcoin trading taxed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(increase, be in property taxes paid)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(increase, be in income)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(increase, be in income)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(increase, be in income)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in income)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in property taxes paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(increase, be in property taxes paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(savings, is taxed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(savings, get taxed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(gain, be subtracted from income)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(gain, be from bitcoin trading taxed)