independent country: has quality definition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, anything
Weight: 0.44
Siblings tanzania
Weight: 0.49
, montenegro
Weight: 0.43
, dominica
Weight: 0.42
, palau
Weight: 0.40
, nation
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality definition 1.00
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(country, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(independent country, has quality definition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(country, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(country, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(montenegro, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tanzania, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dominica, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(country, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(independent country, has quality definition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(dominica, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(dominica, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(montenegro, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(montenegro, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tanzania, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(tanzania, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(independent country, has quality definition)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(independent country, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(independent country, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(independent country, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(independent country, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(independent country, has quality definition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(independent country, has quality definition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(country, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dominica, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(montenegro, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tanzania, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(independent country, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(country, has quality bad)