index: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reference
Weight: 0.61
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, publication
Weight: 0.60
, variable
Weight: 0.60
Siblings measure
Weight: 0.66
, price
Weight: 0.66
, temperature
Weight: 0.62
, index card
Weight: 0.59
, pointer
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is low good 0.81
improve performance 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(index, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(variable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(index, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(reference, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(variable, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(variable, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(index, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(variable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(index, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(index, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(index, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(index, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(index, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(index, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(index, is low good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(index, is low good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(index, is low good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(index, improve performance)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(index, improve performance)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(index, improve performance)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(index, is low good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(index, improve performance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(index, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(index, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(reference, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(reference, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(index, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad)