indian restaurant: be at britsh town

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, place
Weight: 0.54
, food
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at britsh town 1.00
be at town 1.00
be at large town 0.91
be at nice part of town 0.86
be at city 0.85
be at many city 0.80
be at large city 0.79
be at big city 0.78
be at china town 0.78
be at downtown area 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at town)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(place, be at town)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(food, be at city)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(place, be at city)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(place, be at town)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(place, be at city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at town)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(food, be at city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at big city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at town)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(place, be at town)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food, be at city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(place, be at city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at big city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large town)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at china town)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at downtown area)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at town)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(place, be at town)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(food, be at city)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(place, be at city)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large town)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at large town)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at downtown area)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at downtown area)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at china town)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at china town)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be at large city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(place, be at town)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at town)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(place, be at city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(food, be at city)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at big city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at large town)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at china town)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at downtown area)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at big city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(place, be at town)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at town)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(place, be at city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(food, be at city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at big city)