indian restaurant: be at city

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, place
Weight: 0.54
, food
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at city 1.00
be at many city 0.91
be at large city 0.88
be at big city 0.87
be at britsh town 0.85
be at town 0.85
be at downtown area 0.84
be at most city in world 0.84
be at major city 0.84
be at downtown 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(food, be at city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at town)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(place, be at town)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(place, be at city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(place, be at city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(food, be at city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at big city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(place, be at town)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at town)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food, be at city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(place, be at city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at big city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at town)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(place, be at town)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at city)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at city)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at city)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at most city in world)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at downtown)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at downtown area)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(food, be at city)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(place, be at city)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at town)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(place, be at town)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at downtown area)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at downtown area)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at most city in world)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at most city in world)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at downtown)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at downtown)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be at city)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(place, be at city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(food, be at city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at big city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(place, be at town)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at town)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at city)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at city)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at city)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at downtown area)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at most city in world)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at downtown)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at city)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(place, be at city)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(food, be at city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(place, be at town)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at town)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at big city)