indian restaurant: be at food

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, place
Weight: 0.54
, food
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at food 1.00
be used to food 0.97
has food 0.95
be used to eat food 0.92
be used to eat to get food 0.89
be used to eat tasty food 0.85
create pre-made food 0.84
be used to prepare food 0.83
be used to transport food 0.83
be used to sell food 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(restaurant, be used to sell food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(restaurant, create pre-made food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(restaurant, create pre-made food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to sell food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(place, be used to eat to get food)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, create pre-made food)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to sell food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to food)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to food)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(restaurant, be used to sell food)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at food)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at food)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(restaurant, create pre-made food)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be used to food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to food)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be at food)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to sell food)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(restaurant, create pre-made food)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to get food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be used to food)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to food)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to sell food)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(restaurant, create pre-made food)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to get food)