indian restaurant: be at india

Related concepts

Parents	restaurant Weight: 0.73 , place Weight: 0.54 , food Weight: 0.51
Siblings	italian restaurant Weight: 0.41 , chinese restaurant Weight: 0.41 , mexican restaurant Weight: 0.40 , french restaurant Weight: 0.40 , japanese restaurant Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at india	1.00
be at canada	0.83
be at mexico	0.81
be at japan	0.79
be used to serve indian food	0.78
be used to sell indian meal	0.76
be at california	0.76
be at michigan	0.76
be at most european city	0.75
be used to order chinese food	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(restaurant, be at canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at india)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at most european city)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to order chinese food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(restaurant, be at canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to order chinese food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be used to order chinese food)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at california)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at california)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at most european city) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at most european city)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at japan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be at india)

Similarity expansion

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to serve indian food)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to sell indian meal)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to sell indian meal)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to serve indian food)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.25

Salient(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be used to sell indian meal)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to serve indian food)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to sell indian meal)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.25

Salient(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be used to serve indian food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Salient(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(restaurant, be at canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at japan)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be used to order chinese food)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at most european city)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at california)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at california)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(restaurant, be at canada)