indian restaurant: be at seattle

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, place
Weight: 0.54
, food
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at seattle 1.00
be at chicago 0.82
be at nyc 0.81
be at montreal 0.78
be at michigan 0.77
be at california 0.77
be at tulsa 0.76
be at manhattan 0.76
be at japan 0.76
be at new york 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at montreal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at tulsa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at tulsa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at tulsa)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at california)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at nyc)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at manhattan)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at montreal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at montreal)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at california)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at japan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be at seattle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at seattle)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at nyc)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at montreal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at california)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at manhattan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at california)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at tulsa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at new york)