indian restaurant: be closed in afternoon

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, place
Weight: 0.54
, food
Weight: 0.51
Siblings chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be closed in afternoon 1.00
be closed on monday 0.86
be closed on tuesday 0.85
be closed on mondays 0.82
closed on mondays 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(restaurant, be closed on monday)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(restaurant, be closed on mondays)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be closed on monday)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be closed on mondays)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be closed on monday)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be closed on mondays)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be closed on monday)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be closed on tuesday)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, closed on mondays)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(restaurant, be closed on monday)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(restaurant, be closed on mondays)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be closed on monday)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be closed on monday)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be closed on tuesday)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be closed on tuesday)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be closed on mondays)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be closed on mondays)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, closed on mondays)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, closed on mondays)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be closed on mondays)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be closed on mondays)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be closed on monday)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be closed on monday)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed on monday)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be closed on tuesday)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be closed on tuesday)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed on tuesday)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, closed on mondays)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, closed on mondays)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, closed on mondays)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be closed on monday)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, closed on mondays)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be closed on tuesday)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(restaurant, be closed on monday)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(restaurant, be closed on mondays)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be closed on monday)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be closed on tuesday)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, closed on mondays)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(indian restaurant, be closed in afternoon)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(restaurant, be closed on monday)