indian restaurant: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, place
Weight: 0.54
, food
Weight: 0.51
Siblings chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, is expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(indian restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(indian restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(indian restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(indian restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(indian restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(indian restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(indian restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(indian restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(indian restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(indian restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)