indiana: be different from states

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illinois
Weight: 0.64
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.59
, florida
Weight: 0.58
Siblings michigan
Weight: 0.59
, ohio
Weight: 0.36
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from states 1.00
be different from other states 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be different from states)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, be different from states)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be different from states)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, be different from other states)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(indiana, be different from states)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(west virginia, be different from states)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(west virginia, be different from states)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(indiana, be different from states)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(west virginia, be different from other states)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(west virginia, be different from other states)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(indiana, be different from states)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(indiana, be different from states)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(indiana, be different from states)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be different from other states)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(indiana, be different from states)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(indiana, be different from other states)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(indiana, be different from states)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(indiana, be different from other states)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(indiana, be different from states)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(indiana, be different from other states)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(indiana, be different from states)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(indiana, be different from states)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be different from states)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(indiana, be different from states)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(indiana, be different from states)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be different from states)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(west virginia, be different from states)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be different from states)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(west virginia, be different from other states)