indiana: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illinois
Weight: 0.64
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.59
, florida
Weight: 0.58
Siblings michigan
Weight: 0.59
, ohio
Weight: 0.36
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
is bad state 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(school, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(indiana, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(indiana, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(school, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(school, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(school, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(indiana, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(indiana, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(indiana, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(indiana, is bad state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(indiana, is bad state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(indiana, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(school, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(west virginia, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(school, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(indiana, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)