indiana: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illinois
Weight: 0.64
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.59
, florida
Weight: 0.58
Siblings michigan
Weight: 0.59
, ohio
Weight: 0.36
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
be called state 0.89
is bad state 0.85
is red state 0.81
is best state 0.80
be known as state 0.78
is hoosier state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(illinois, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(florida, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(florida, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(illinois, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(florida, is red state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(illinois, has state state)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(florida, is red state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(florida, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is red state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, is red state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is red state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is best state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(illinois, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(florida, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, has state state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(west virginia, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has state state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(michigan, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(michigan, has state state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(missouri, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, be called state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ohio, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ohio, is best state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(michigan, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(michigan, is best state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(west virginia, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is red state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(ohio, is red state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tennessee, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tennessee, is red state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(missouri, is red state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(indiana, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(indiana, is bad state)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(indiana, is bad state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(indiana, be called state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is hoosier state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(indiana, is hoosier state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(indiana, is hoosier state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(indiana, is hoosier state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(indiana, be known as state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(indiana, be known as state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(indiana, be known as state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(indiana, is red state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(indiana, is best state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(indiana, is red state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(indiana, is best state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(indiana, is best state)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(indiana, is red state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(illinois, has state state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(florida, is red state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(west virginia, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ohio, is red state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(west virginia, is red state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(michigan, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tennessee, is red state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(missouri, is red state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(illinois, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(florida, is red state)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)