indiana: have tornadoes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illinois
Weight: 0.64
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.59
, florida
Weight: 0.58
Siblings michigan
Weight: 0.59
, ohio
Weight: 0.36
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have tornadoes 1.00
have earthquakes 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(illinois, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(indiana, have tornadoes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(illinois, have earthquakes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have earthquakes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(michigan, have tornadoes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(michigan, have earthquakes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have earthquakes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(illinois, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(indiana, have tornadoes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(michigan, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(michigan, have tornadoes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(michigan, have earthquakes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(ohio, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ohio, have earthquakes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(indiana, have tornadoes)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(indiana, have earthquakes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(indiana, have earthquakes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have earthquakes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(indiana, have earthquakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have tornadoes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(indiana, have tornadoes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(illinois, have earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(michigan, have tornadoes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(michigan, have earthquakes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(ohio, have earthquakes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(illinois, have earthquakes)