indiana: is best state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illinois
Weight: 0.64
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.59
, florida
Weight: 0.58
Siblings michigan
Weight: 0.59
, ohio
Weight: 0.36
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best state 1.00
is bad state 0.83
has state state 0.80
be called state 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(indiana, is best state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(indiana, is best state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(illinois, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(indiana, is best state)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(indiana, is best state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(indiana, is best state)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(indiana, is best state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(florida, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(illinois, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(illinois, has state state)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(florida, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is best state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(indiana, is best state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(illinois, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(indiana, is best state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(indiana, is best state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(indiana, is best state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(indiana, is best state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(indiana, is best state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ohio, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ohio, is best state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(michigan, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(michigan, is best state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(west virginia, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(michigan, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(michigan, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(missouri, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, be called state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(indiana, is best state)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(indiana, is bad state)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(indiana, is bad state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(indiana, has state state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(indiana, be called state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(indiana, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(illinois, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(west virginia, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(michigan, is best state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(illinois, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(indiana, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be called state)