indiana: is red state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illinois
Weight: 0.64
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.59
, florida
Weight: 0.58
Siblings michigan
Weight: 0.59
, ohio
Weight: 0.36
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is red state 1.00
has color red 0.87
has state state 0.81
be called state 0.78
is bad state 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(indiana, is red state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(florida, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(indiana, is red state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(indiana, is red state)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(illinois, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(indiana, is red state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(indiana, is red state)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(indiana, is red state)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(indiana, is red state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(florida, is red state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(florida, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(illinois, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(florida, has color red)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(florida, is red state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(illinois, has state state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(florida, has color red)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(florida, has state state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is red state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, is red state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is red state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has color red)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has color red)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ohio, has color red)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(florida, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(indiana, is red state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(indiana, is red state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(indiana, is red state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(illinois, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(indiana, is red state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(indiana, is red state)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(indiana, is red state)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(indiana, is red state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(west virginia, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is red state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(ohio, is red state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tennessee, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tennessee, is red state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(missouri, is red state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ohio, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(ohio, has color red)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(tennessee, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has color red)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(west virginia, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(missouri, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(missouri, has color red)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(michigan, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(michigan, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(missouri, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, be called state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(indiana, is red state)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(indiana, is bad state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(indiana, is bad state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(indiana, has color red)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(indiana, be called state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(indiana, has state state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(indiana, has color red)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(indiana, has color red)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has color red)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(indiana, is red state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(florida, is red state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(illinois, has state state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(florida, has color red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(west virginia, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ohio, is red state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(west virginia, is red state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tennessee, is red state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tennessee, has color red)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(missouri, is red state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ohio, has color red)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(missouri, has color red)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(florida, is red state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(illinois, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(florida, has color red)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)