indies: have names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents party
Weight: 0.37
, place
Weight: 0.34
, book
Weight: 0.32
, voyage
Weight: 0.30
, community
Weight: 0.22
Siblings liberal party
Weight: 0.28
, labour party
Weight: 0.27
, conservative party
Weight: 0.27
, democratic party
Weight: 0.27
, political party
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
have names 1.00
have indian names 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(place, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(indies, have names)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(indies, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(place, have names)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(indies, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(place, have names)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(place, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(indies, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(indies, have names)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(indies, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(indies, have names)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(indies, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(indies, have indian names)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(indies, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(indies, have indian names)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(indies, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(indies, have indian names)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(indies, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(indies, have indian names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(indies, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(indies, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(indies, have names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(indies, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(indies, have names)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(indies, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(place, have names)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(indies, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(place, have names)