indonesia: be compared australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents east asia
Weight: 0.69
, japan
Weight: 0.68
, nation
Weight: 0.61
, europe
Weight: 0.61
, iran
Weight: 0.60
Siblings singapore
Weight: 0.64
, malaysia
Weight: 0.60
, south korea
Weight: 0.36
, korea
Weight: 0.36
, thailand
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be compared australia 1.00
be economically different from australia 0.84
be culturally different from australia 0.80
be poorer than malaysia 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, be culturally different from australia)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, be economically different from australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(malaysia, be economically different from australia)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(malaysia, be economically different from australia)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(malaysia, be culturally different from australia)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(malaysia, be culturally different from australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(indonesia, be compared australia)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(indonesia, be economically different from australia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(indonesia, be culturally different from australia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(indonesia, be poorer than malaysia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(indonesia, be economically different from australia)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(indonesia, be economically different from australia)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(indonesia, be culturally different from australia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(indonesia, be economically different from australia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(indonesia, be poorer than malaysia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(indonesia, be culturally different from australia)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(indonesia, be culturally different from australia)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(indonesia, be poorer than malaysia)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(indonesia, be poorer than malaysia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(indonesia, be compared australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(indonesia, be compared australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(malaysia, be economically different from australia)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(indonesia, be compared australia)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(malaysia, be culturally different from australia)