industry: be at big city

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents publication
Weight: 0.62
, business
Weight: 0.60
, institution
Weight: 0.58
, attribute
Weight: 0.55
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.83
, software company
Weight: 0.66
, solar energy
Weight: 0.66
, fast food
Weight: 0.65
, management
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at big city 1.00
be at city 0.87
be at small town 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(business, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(industry, be at big city)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(industry, be at big city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(business, be at big city)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(business, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(business, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at small town)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(industry, be at big city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(business, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(industry, be at big city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fast food, be at small town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at small town)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(industry, be at big city)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(industry, be at city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(industry, be at city)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(industry, be at city)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(industry, be at city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(industry, be at big city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(industry, be at big city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(business, be at big city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(business, be at city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fast food, be at small town)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(business, be at big city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(business, be at city)