industry: be important to uk economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.70
, publication
Weight: 0.62
, ministry
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.58
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.83
, banking industry
Weight: 0.80
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.72
, aviation
Weight: 0.70
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to uk economy 1.00
be important to economy 0.86
be important to country 's economy 0.85
be important to australian economy 0.85
be in indian economy 0.84
be in economy 0.84
be in indian economy interdependent 0.82
be important to economic growth 0.78
be important for economic growth 0.78
be in economy interdependent 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(sector, be important to economy)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(industry, be important to uk economy)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(institution, be important for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(industry, be important to uk economy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(institution, be important to economic growth)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(industry, be important to uk economy)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(sector, be in indian economy interdependent)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(industry, be important to uk economy)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sector, be in economy interdependent)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(industry, be important to uk economy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(sector, be in indian economy)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(industry, be important to uk economy)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sector, be in economy)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(industry, be important to uk economy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(sector, be in indian economy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sector, be in economy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(sector, be in indian economy interdependent)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sector, be in economy interdependent)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(sector, be important to economy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(institution, be important to economic growth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(institution, be important for economic growth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(sector, be in indian economy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sector, be in economy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sector, be in indian economy interdependent)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sector, be in economy interdependent)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sector, be important to economy)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(institution, be important for economic growth)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(institution, be important to economic growth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(aviation, be important to economic growth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(sector, be important to economy)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(institution, be important for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(institution, be important to economic growth)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(sector, be in indian economy interdependent)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sector, be in economy interdependent)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(sector, be in indian economy)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sector, be in economy)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(aviation, be important to economic growth)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(aviation, be important to economic growth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(industry, be important to uk economy)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(industry, be important to economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(industry, be important to australian economy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to economy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to country 's economy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(industry, be important to economy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to australian economy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(industry, be important to country 's economy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(industry, be important to australian economy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to country 's economy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(industry, be important to country 's economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(industry, be important to uk economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sector, be in economy)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sector, be in indian economy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(sector, be in economy interdependent)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sector, be in indian economy interdependent)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sector, be important to economy)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(institution, be important to economic growth)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(institution, be important for economic growth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(aviation, be important to economic growth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sector, be in economy)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sector, be in indian economy)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(sector, be in economy interdependent)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sector, be in indian economy interdependent)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sector, be important to economy)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(institution, be important to economic growth)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(industry, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(institution, be important for economic growth)