inequality: affect economic growth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect economic growth 1.00
be bad for economic growth 0.96
affect growth 0.94
is economic 0.92
be bad for growth 0.88
is economic problem 0.86
reduce growth 0.85
affect economic inequality 0.84
be good for economy 0.83
be bad for economy 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(inequality, affect economic growth)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic inequality)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(inequality, reduce growth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(inequality, reduce growth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(inequality, be good for economy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(inequality, be good for economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(inequality, reduce growth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(inequality, reduce growth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(inequality, is economic)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inequality, be good for economy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(inequality, is economic problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(inequality, affect economic inequality)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)